Continuing the discussion from Is SE23.life too cliquey?:
is @Mr_Robin_Banks correct?
Only time and votes will tell…
- 20 and under
- 21 to 30
- 31 to 40
- 41 to 50
- 51 to 60
- 61 to 70
- 70 and above
0 voters
Continuing the discussion from Is SE23.life too cliquey?:
is @Mr_Robin_Banks correct?
Only time and votes will tell…
0 voters
That’s funny.
RobinBanks’s estimate was 35-45 but the age range options can’t give a proper result.
Should be under 25, 25-34, 35-45, 46-55, 56-65 and dying-dead.
I’m not going to answer this. Before we know where we are, it’ll be ethnicity, occupation, level of education, sexual orientation, religion, political affiliation, housing tenure, disability status, IQ, blood group, favourite colour, favorite movie, favourite saying…
Don’t forget gender …! Male, female, transgender, genderqueer, agender, androgynous, bigender… and so many more
Should the penultimate box read 61 - 70 ?
Now seems to have been corrected.
You forgot cis
wait so was I more or less right? top 30s low 40s?
67% of a (very small) sample are aged between 31 and 50.