Foresthillnick
1 Oct '17
What an idiot…
What an idiot…
What a shame. He’s a well respected artist, I’m very surprised.
I think the Standard was too trigger-happy with this story.
Yes - the graffiti bears Nathan’s name and style, but the man is innocent until proven guilty.
I think that they used the correct language “accused”, “being investigated” etc…
I don’t see any gun-jumping - they haven’t said he’s guilty, just that it is being investigated.